French Resistance and Roman Fiction
UK
Shopping Basket
Your Basket is Empty
Quantity:
Subtotal
Taxes
Delivery
Total
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
Thank you for your business!You should receive an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping BasketA World War 2 Trilogy
By FRED NATH (Novelist and Neurosurgeon)
Fred's Blog
Fred's Blog
Blog
Covid-19 [4]
| Posted on 31 March, 2020 at 3:50 |
I realise most of it isn’t rocket
science, but as a neurosurgeon, I’m used to looking at figures of outcomes and
mortality. I’m puzzled. In January last year the winter
mortality in the UK was just about 1500 deaths per day. The daily death rate
fell to around 1200 by 31 March 2019. The cause of the excess
deaths (1500 – 1200 = 300) was due to an increase in respiratory infections,
mainly in the elderly. I have not seen the current daily
death rates for this year, but it remains unclear to me whether the figures
given out for Covid-19 are to be included in the normal daily death rate or
whether they are on top of the known seasonal excess winter death rates. It is
puzzling because I have a suspicion that a proportion of the people dying from
Covid-19 would have died from another respiratory illness (influenza,
bronchopneumonia) in any case. The only way to know would be to look at the
effect that Covid-19 has had on those figures. The Office of National
Statistics indicates that in the week beginning 13/3/20 11,019 deaths were
registered. The comparable average figure during the previous 5 years was 11,205.
There is no significant difference between the two as far as I can see but
maybe I’m missing something. You might be thinking that Covid-19
figures have not been taken into account yet, but when you think about it, the
figures we have are related to the testing statistics – number of cases = number
of positive tests in people admitted to hospital because they have become
seriously ill. The figures bandied about indicate
around 200 deaths per day at present. If the mortality from this virus is 1-3%
(we’ll call it 2%), then the over all incidence in the general population is
probably around 10,000 ((200 x 100)/2). This makes little sense when others
suggest up to 50% of the population may have been exposed to the virus. The fact is we have no idea how
many people are or have been infected, because only a selected group have been
tested and all it tells you is the number of hospital admissions who actually
have the virus in their nose/throat. Once the antibody test is
available things will become much clearer. We will have a better understanding
of who has been exposed and who is probably immune. I guess in a round about way, all
I’m saying is the information given out generally is confusing and there just
isn’t enough data about the general population’s exposure to predict anything. There is an article in The
Spectator which is interesting: It makes the point that many
deaths due to Covid-19 may simply be an incidental cause of death in people who
would have died of another virus in any case. I sincerely hope it’s true. |
Categories: thoughts
/